Lateral Lining in Florida
April 2, 2014
Here is how one Florida community reduced inflow-and-infiltration (I/I) by 232 million gals and stands to save $368,000 per year, with an investment of $1 million.
What makes this project different from other lining projects?
The Coral Springs Improvement District, located in Broward County, Fla., is contained within the City of Coral Springs. The District manages its own collection and water systems and is home to around 45,000 residents.Lift Station Basin No. 1 was placed in service in 1974; the collection basin serves more than 400 single family homes. There are approximately 20,600 ft of 8-in. VCP mainline pipe and 6,000 ft of 6-in. VCP lateral pipes. In 1999, the District lined 17,000 ft of mains to reduce pump run times which produced positive results, but not the long-term results they needed. The District had continued to experience unacceptably high levels of I/I. The laterals were suspected as the major cause of the problem, so the District took an aggressive approach to investigating the root cause of the problem and finding a long-term solution.
The first phase of the project consisted of inspecting all laterals in the entire basin area, and mainline pipe that was not lined in previous years. The laterals were inspected by launching a camera up the lateral from the main to the private property line. Inspecting the laterals was challenging because the infiltrating groundwater kept the system surcharged. LMK Pipe Renewal of Fort Lauderdale provided organized spreadsheets and PACP video inspection reports identifying the condition of the pipe and what repairs would be required to seal the system.
It was determined there were three major sources of infiltration occurring:
1. Groundwater was tracking behind the mainline liners and entering the system where the mainline liner was cut open to reinstate the service connections. Additionally, the terminating ends of the old mainline liners were leaking allowing ground water to enter the system.
2. The lateral survey revealed leaking lateral pipe defects such as cracks, calcium deposits, offsets, holes, roots and staining.
3. There were also defective mainline segments that were not lined during the 1999 project.
There is a common misunderstanding about CIPP pipe lining. Assumptions that the resin sticks or bonds to the host pipe are not valid; little or no bonding occurs and the explanation is practical from an engineering design point of view. The host pipe actually acts like a mold, yet shrinkage commonly occurs through polymerization of the resin, and thermal expansion/contraction occurs along with earth movement. Likewise, FOG (fats, oil and grease) prevents bonding. These conditions create an annular space where the constant groundwater pressure migrates between the pipe and the liner only to leak back into the system at lateral reinstatements and into the manholes. The Insignia Seals situated in the annular space, expand and form a compression seal between the host pipe and the new liner.
“The significant amount of I/I reduction impacted other stations in the system and brought our utility management issues under control. Lift Station Number 1 pumps into a manifold force main, we have seen a reduction in adjacent stations run times as well. This further reduces stress on the pumps beyond this station. These reductions weren’t even part of the savings calculated. It’s just another benefit to the system for correcting excess infiltration,” said Seigfried.
“This is our largest lift station in the system and it was experiencing large amounts of infiltration; I didn’t think we would ever see the bottom of the station again. With the repairs performed, the pressures are down in the overall system and we haven’t had a call out on this station since we did the project,” said Dwiggins.
“The amount of groundwater infiltrating made it difficult to work in the system. For the most part, the mains were already lined; the water was tracking and also coming down the laterals ending up in the sewer. We had to isolate and pump down the section in which we were working. We could tell that we were having a big impact on the system because the more work we performed, the less bypass pumping we had to do. The system was drying up! In this station we reduced the flow by approximately 636,000 GPD. To put this into perspective, that’s about 32 swimming pools per day. All that water now remains in the aquifer instead of being pumped down the sewer,” explained LMK Pipe Renewal project manager Mark Gulyas.
The result is a conservation of our groundwater resources, protection of the environment, and a good return on investment. The District invested $1 million for this rehabilitation project, which was completed over a 10-month period. The District reports reduction of infiltration into its system by 232 million gals annually, with savings of $365,000 yearly. Even though years earlier a large part of the system had the mains lined, it wasn’t until the laterals were lined that the hidden value in the previous lining project was revealed. The payback for the entire project is just 2.6 years, and going forward the District’s investment will actually continue to save or earn CSID $365,000 each year for the life of the repairs.
Quality wins out every time when you consider the cost of resolving defects left behind by inadequate designs. Savings are waiting to be realized, this project is a win-win for many years to come.
John Rinehart is with LMK Pipe Renewal.